Gigabyte GA-A520 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics96.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive99.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A520 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory20.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201231
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 11 '24 at 18:01
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G-$165
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Memory 78.2
1-Core 150
2-Core 288
93% 172 Pts
4-Core 554
8-Core 929
90% 742 Pts
64-Core 1,353
84% 1,353 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-12GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
96.1% Outstanding
Lighting 122
Reflection 108
Parallax 122
99% 117 fps
MRender 130
Gravity 112
Splatting 95.9
90% 113 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 102%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SHGS31-1000GS-2 1TB
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 90000Q00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 474 395 366 332 318 370 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Read 477
Write 474
Mixed 418
SusWrite 376
98% 436 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 84.2
4K Mixed 37.2
132% 49.2 MB/s
DQ Read 391
DQ Write 355
DQ Mixed 366
276% 371 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GF1X16QFHH36-135-K 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62% Good
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 24.1
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 22.3
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 86.7
46% 86.7 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 62%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 12: 0P 1R 1G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
12% 11% 54 216 58 60 24" 1280 720 HPN3358 HP V244h
Typical GA-A520 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 722 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A520 AORUS ELITE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $426
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback