ONDA A320S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics71.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive79.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemONDA A320S  (all builds)
MotherboardONDA A320S
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220622
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateMay 11 '24 at 17:20
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$145
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
79.8% Very good
Memory 76
1-Core 116
2-Core 225
77% 139 Pts
4-Core 449
8-Core 674
70% 562 Pts
64-Core 871
54% 871 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.1% Very good
Lighting 88.3
Reflection 90.2
Parallax 90
72% 89.5 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 77.9
Splatting 72
70% 87.2 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Itech 128GB 128GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VE0R6338
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 424 73 150 174 130 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 392
Write 420
Mixed 348
SusWrite 228
78% 347 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 83.5
4K Mixed 37.8
134% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 86.1
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 138
119% 170 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 93%
WD WD30EURS-63SPKY0 3TB
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 82 83 82 81 82 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 94.5
Write 85.7
Mixed 85.7
SusWrite 81.7
65% 86.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM3200HLE-16G 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 15
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 17.1
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 88.3
45% 88.3 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 51%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 26" 1280 720 XXX0000 AAA
Typical A320S Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: ONDA A320S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback