Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506II_TUF506II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics11.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
26 days ago, 26 days ago.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506II_TUF506II  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA506II
Memory5.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210312
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMay 11 '24 at 16:51
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Memory 78.6
1-Core 129
2-Core 265
86% 158 Pts
4-Core 484
8-Core 743
76% 613 Pts
64-Core 911
56% 911 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 16DF) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.14
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Lighting 14.2
Reflection 16.1
Parallax 19.7
12% 16.7 fps
MRender 13.8
Gravity 15.2
Splatting 16.1
12% 15 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P5 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R324 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 951
Write 853
Mixed 435
165% 746 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 84.7
4K Mixed 32.4
136% 49.9 MB/s
DQ Read 503
DQ Write 637
DQ Mixed 773
527% 638 MB/s
Poor: 168% Great: 332%
Ct1000bx 50 1TB
304GB free
Firmware: M6CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 30 312 11 11 9.5 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 488
Write 343
Mixed 395
SusWrite 125
75% 338 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 70.2
4K Mixed 22.5
104% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 159
DQ Write 253
DQ Mixed 32.8
74% 148 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.M8FRS 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
92% Outstanding
MC Read 38.1
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 33.1
99% 34.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 29.7
SC Mixed 20.7
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 91.8
44% 91.8 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 92%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 53 144 15.5" 1280 720 CMN1521
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506II_TUF506II Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506II_TUF506II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback