Lenovo 83GS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics66.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive225% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 83GS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240108
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 11 '24 at 16:45
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
12th Gen Intel Core i5-12450HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Memory 62.1
1-Core 175
2-Core 343
99% 193 Pts
4-Core 648
8-Core 929
99% 788 Pts
64-Core 1,147
71% 1,147 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
Legend(17AA 3D06) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
66.8% Good
Lighting 90.8
Reflection 82.9
Parallax 83.3
74% 85.7 fps
MRender 63.1
Gravity 69.3
Splatting 62.3
53% 64.9 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 75%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Solidigm SSDPFINW512GZL 512GB
421GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C02C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1119 1342 1393 1218 781 235 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
225% Outstanding
Read 1,314
Write 1,325
Mixed 978
SusWrite 1,015
260% 1,158 MB/s
4K Read 52.9
4K Write 192
4K Mixed 63.4
263% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 448
DQ Write 926
DQ Mixed 565
464% 646 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 225%
Great: 262%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
124% Outstanding
MC Read 50.8
MC Write 48.3
MC Mixed 45.1
137% 48.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 41.9
SC Mixed 22.8
79% 27.5 GB/s
Latency 113
36% 113 ns
Poor: 101%
This bench: 124%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 51 144 15.5" 1536 793 AUO7EAD
Typical 83GS Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 83GS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback