Acer Nitro AN515-57

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-57  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL Scala_TLS
Memory1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220602
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateMay 11 '24 at 16:43
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 69.9
1-Core 144
2-Core 230
82% 148 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 715
71% 581 Pts
64-Core 802
50% 802 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
Acer(1025 153A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56% Above average
Lighting 72.3
Reflection 93.2
Parallax 72.3
59% 79.3 fps
MRender 70.1
Gravity 57.7
Splatting 58.3
50% 62 fps
Poor: 36%
This bench: 56%
Great: 65%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme HFM512GD3JX016N 512GB
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41020C20 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,306
Write 2,154
Mixed 1,659
454% 2,040 MB/s
4K Read 66.5
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 79.8
286% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 76.1
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 112
99% 143 MB/s
Poor: 159% Great: 304%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
803GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 153 160 159 158 157 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 456
Write 167
Mixed 168
SusWrite 155
52% 236 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 64.2
4K Mixed 25.1
92% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 19.8
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 28.9
32% 50.3 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 1x8GB
1 of 8 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
41.9% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 13.7
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 13
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 11: 0P 2R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
11% 50% 6 204 55 144 27" 1920 1009 MSI4CA9 MSI G27C4 E2
Typical Nitro AN515-57 Builds (Compare 15,207 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-57

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback