TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Alienware 17 R4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics96.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive168% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAlienware 17 R4  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware Alienware 17 R4
Memory24 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181115
Uptime141.1 Days
Run DateMay 11 '24 at 16:14
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820HK
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 102
2-Core 176
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 566
56% 458 Pts
64-Core 569
35% 569 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑
This bench: 73.7%
 Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080 (Mobile)
Dell(1028 07C2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (53rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
96.6% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 126
Parallax 125
96% 123 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 128
Splatting 115
97% 119 fps
Poor: 66% ↑
This bench: 96.6%
 Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSN5256GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 57XA4104 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 841 720 887 905 854 242 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
168% Outstanding
Read 1,240
Write 969
Mixed 816
SusWrite 741
211% 942 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 87.7
4K Mixed 49.6
155% 55.6 MB/s
DQ Read 572
DQ Write 512
DQ Mixed 567
418% 550 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑
This bench: 168%
 Great: 207%
PNY CS900 960GB-$48
894GB free
Firmware: CS900BA3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 256 251 257 255 259 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Read 399
Write 378
Mixed 340
SusWrite 272
78% 347 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 57.2
4K Mixed 29.9
106% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 204
174% 253 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑
This bench: 77.8%
 Great: 104%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
49GB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 3.3 3.8 9.3 66 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
27.8% Poor
Read 139
Write 122
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 26.9
91% 76.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
39% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑
This bench: 27.8%
 Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2666 C19 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
86.8% Excellent
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 35
MC Mixed 27.3
89% 31.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 35.2
SC Mixed 25.2
74% 26.1 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 69% ↑
This bench: 86.8%
 Great: 90%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 64 50 60 27" 1280 720 AUS2786 VG27B
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical 17 R4 Builds (Compare 2,700 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

System: Alienware 17 R4

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples1,219x
Core i7-7820HKIntelBench 72%, 18,903 samples764x
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples534x
GPU
GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples978x
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples566x
GTX 1080 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 95%, 17,197 samples443x
SSD
THNSN5256GPUK NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBToshibaBench 109%, 23,829 samples193x
X400 M.2 2280 128GBSandiskBench 65%, 12,357 samples154x
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBToshiba  $50Bench 125%, 44,050 samples135x
RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 27,567 samples792x
HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH 2x16GBUnknownBench 75%, 4,851 samples193x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-VK 2x8GBUnknownBench 75%, 4,951 samples176x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback