Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1605VA_X1605VA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive281% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1605VA_X1605VA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X1605VA
Memory6.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230817
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateMay 11 '24 at 16:05
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 67.6
1-Core 166
2-Core 252
89% 162 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 614
62% 504 Pts
64-Core 778
48% 778 Pts
Poor: 96%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 1743) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Lighting 14.3
Reflection 18.7
Parallax 18.2
12% 17.1 fps
MRender 16.6
Gravity 20.9
Splatting 14.7
14% 17.4 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 22%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00-1102 1TB
584GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 74114000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1217 1312 1253 1550 1635 1618 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
281% Outstanding
Read 2,723
Write 2,128
Mixed 1,680
SusWrite 1431
445% 1,990 MB/s
4K Read 54.7
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 65.5
226% 77.3 MB/s
DQ Read 393
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 365
262% 341 MB/s
Poor: 148%
This bench: 281%
Great: 523%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2G44BM0-CWE 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
39.9% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 12
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 15
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 16" 1280 720 AUO459D
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1605VA_X1605VA Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1605VA_X1605VA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback