Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics30.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS V FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory24.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130819
Uptime27.1 Days
Run DateMay 11 '24 at 15:19
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Memory 90.7
1-Core 103
2-Core 207
77% 134 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 527
58% 456 Pts
64-Core 527
33% 527 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
EVGA(3842 2686) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 474.44
Performing below potential (54th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.9% Below average
Lighting 35.7
Reflection 35.5
Parallax 46.9
29% 39.4 fps
MRender 47.5
Gravity 44.8
Splatting 35.9
34% 42.7 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 4 256GB-$400
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.5
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 336
Write 338
Mixed 228
67% 301 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 43.2
4K Mixed 27.4
92% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 214
163% 221 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 106%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
888GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 135
Write 117
Mixed 114
92% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
212% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 76%
WD My Book 1140 3TB
850GB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 124
Write 126
Mixed 89.9
144% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
123% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 59%
WD My Book 25EE 6TB
3.5TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 174
Write 160
Mixed 109
183% 148 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 8
4K Mixed 0.7
348% 7.6 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
49.4% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 14.8
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 16.4
46% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 23.8" 1280 720 HKC2421 24N1A
Typical MAXIMUS V FORMULA Builds (Compare 714 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA - $349

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $890
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $26Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback