Microsoft Surface Pro 7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics13.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicrosoft Surface Pro 7  (all builds)
MotherboardMicrosoft Surface Pro 7
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display2736 x 1824 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231102
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateMay 11 '24 at 15:06
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1065G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
67.5% Good
Memory 63.3
1-Core 110
2-Core 224
71% 132 Pts
4-Core 403
8-Core 470
57% 436 Pts
64-Core 462
29% 462 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus G7
Microsoft(1414 0037) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2125
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Lighting 15.7
Reflection 15.4
Parallax 16.7
13% 15.9 fps
MRender 16.9
Gravity 16.4
Splatting 18.4
14% 17.2 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg40zpz256g TOSHIBA MEMORY 256GB
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AEMS0102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 494 146 197 141 569 581 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 58% Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9HCNNNCPNALHR-NEE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 3733 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
103% Outstanding
MC Read 41
MC Write 40.9
MC Mixed 36.4
113% 39.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 33.4
SC Mixed 24.2
70% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 103%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 60 12.3" 1368 912 LGD0555
Typical Surface Pro 7 Builds (Compare 1,953 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Microsoft Surface Pro 7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback