Asrock H610M-HDV/M.2 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics43.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive220% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H610M-HDV/M.2 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 11 '24 at 14:45
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-12100F-$85
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Memory 82.8
1-Core 168
2-Core 313
101% 188 Pts
4-Core 546
8-Core 798
84% 672 Pts
64-Core 808
50% 808 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6500-XT-$140
AMD(1002 0E46) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 24.4.1
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.1% Average
Lighting 48.9
Reflection 71
Parallax 96.3
40% 72.1 fps
MRender 107
Gravity 55
Splatting 32.8
49% 65 fps
Poor: 44%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
KZ512 512GB
435GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1103E0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1294 1349 1380 1331 1333 1282 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
220% Outstanding
Read 1,270
Write 1,305
Mixed 893
SusWrite 1328
270% 1,199 MB/s
4K Read 39.7
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 24
174% 73.9 MB/s
DQ Read 704
DQ Write 1,026
DQ Mixed 472
467% 734 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 220%
Great: 244%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 39.7
MC Write 41.2
MC Mixed 36.7
112% 39.2 GB/s
SC Read 23.8
SC Write 42.2
SC Mixed 29.9
91% 32 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 108%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 55: 0P 5R 5G 15B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
55% 24% 106 207 56 60 23.8" 1280 720 SAM71A8 S24R35xFZ
Typical H610M-HDV/M.2 R2.0 Builds (Compare 202 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock H610M-HDV/M.2 R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $386
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback