Asus TUF GAMING B760-PLUS WIFI D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics75% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive98.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B760-PLUS WIFI D4  (all builds)
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230803
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 11 '24 at 14:29
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 53%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400F-$120
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Memory 79.7
1-Core 161
2-Core 307
98% 182 Pts
4-Core 532
8-Core 936
89% 734 Pts
64-Core 1,184
73% 1,184 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Asus(1043 8787) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
75% Very good
Lighting 94.6
Reflection 91.5
Parallax 85.7
77% 90.6 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 80.8
Splatting 72.2
71% 89.2 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 75%
Great: 76%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253512GB 512GB
326GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN14191
SusWrite @10s intervals: 471 435 429 407 407 410 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Read 416
Write 435
Mixed 409
SusWrite 426
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 94.7
4K Mixed 37.9
145% 54.3 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 288
208% 265 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot Memory (PDP Systems) 3200 C16 Series 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
MC Read 34.6
MC Write 33.1
MC Mixed 30.9
94% 32.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 34.9
SC Mixed 25.4
78% 27.3 GB/s
Latency 80.3
50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 27" 1280 720 SAM0D32 C27F390
Typical TUF GAMING B760-PLUS WIFI D4 Builds (Compare 1,039 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 224%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 243%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B760-PLUS WIFI D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $847
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $37
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback