MSI MS-16W1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.74% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive160% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star GF65 Thin 9SD
MotherboardMSI MS-16W1  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211021
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 11 '24 at 11:45
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
66.8% Good
Memory 83.7
1-Core 96.9
2-Core 163
68% 114 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 375
41% 324 Pts
64-Core 445
28% 445 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 12AA) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7584
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.74% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 8.7
Parallax 7.5
5% 7.47 fps
MRender 9.5
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 9.5
7% 8.53 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.74%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1032 512GB
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21111000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 748 415 370 369 346 371 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
160% Outstanding
Read 1,536
Write 1,504
Mixed 1,223
SusWrite 436
263% 1,175 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 76.4
4K Mixed 50.8
164% 55.3 MB/s
DQ Read 551
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 480
350% 462 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 160%
Great: 232%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-SD4-2666 Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-VK 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
73.6% Very good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 21.5
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 31
SC Mixed 22.4
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 75
53% 75 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 56 29 48 15.5" 1280 720 AUOD0ED
Typical MS-16W1 Builds (Compare 4,747 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: MSI MS-16W1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback