Asrock B85M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock B85M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140703
Uptime186.3 Days
Run DateMay 11 '24 at 07:50
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 89.8
1-Core 99.4
2-Core 198
75% 129 Pts
4-Core 371
8-Core 350
49% 360 Pts
64-Core 320
20% 320 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Zotac(19DA 1375) 2GB
CLim: 1405 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.4% Below average
Lighting 41
Reflection 44.3
Parallax 39.7
33% 41.7 fps
MRender 37.9
Gravity 39.7
Splatting 34.9
30% 37.5 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Klevv NEO N400 SSD 240GB
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1205A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 56 33 51 35 53 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 454
Write 110
Mixed 36
SusWrite 44.2
34% 161 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 17.7
4K Mixed 25.8
82% 23.2 MB/s
DQ Read 93.5
DQ Write 81.1
DQ Mixed 1.5
25% 58.7 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 93%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
143GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 86 99 99 99 99 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 101
Write 98.8
Mixed 65.5
SusWrite 96.6
67% 90.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
56.3% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 17.4
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 16.1
48% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 6: 0P 0R 2G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
6% 9% 23 214 57 60 23" 1280 720 GSM59C6 2D FHD LG TV
Typical B85M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,267 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock B85M Pro4 - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $387
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback