Csl-computer A0000001

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive207% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCsl-computer A0000001  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING
Memory25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 11 '24 at 07:02
Run Duration318 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$495
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
88% Excellent
Memory 80.2
1-Core 147
2-Core 292
93% 173 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 1,121
95% 817 Pts
64-Core 2,769
171% 2,769 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 88%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 552.22
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 210
Reflection 202
Parallax 247
171% 219 fps
Gravity 212
Splatting 158
160% 185 fps
Poor: 128% Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$55
364GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P2CR010 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1092 555 410 412 422 408 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
207% Outstanding
Read 1,170
Write 1,369
Mixed 1,253
SusWrite 550
245% 1,085 MB/s
4K Read 47.3
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 72.7
255% 96.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,273
DQ Write 898
DQ Mixed 1,130
832% 1,100 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 207%
Great: 253%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
1.5TB free
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2301 2319 2332 2339 2333 2305 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
385% Outstanding
Read 2,326
Write 2,251
Mixed 2,134
SusWrite 2,322
509% 2258 MB/s
4K Read 66.8
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 89.8
294% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 1,434
DQ Write 1,195
DQ Mixed 1,303
979% 1,311 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 385%
Great: 435%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
432GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 353 426 444 449 378 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 436
Mixed 433
SusWrite 393
99% 438 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 83.4
4K Mixed 48.5
161% 55.9 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 197
149% 201 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 103%
Great: 129%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$50
448GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 419 421 419 417 417 373 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 477
Write 416
Mixed 415
SusWrite 411
97% 430 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 77
4K Mixed 48.3
154% 53 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 185
143% 197 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 101%
Great: 125%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$106
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 186 185 186 186 187 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Read 127
Write 109
Mixed 28.4
SusWrite 185
81% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.9
348% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 110%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90
2TB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 193 193 194 195 195 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 212
Write 209
Mixed 63.4
SusWrite 193
123% 169 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 2.7
455% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 116%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 41
MC Write 36.4
MC Mixed 37.9
110% 38.4 GB/s
SC Read 26.3
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 36.1
81% 28.2 GB/s
Latency 80.4
50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 58 144 48.9" 1280 720 SAM0E5E C49HG9x
Typical A0000001 Builds (Compare 1,736 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO

System: Csl-computer A0000001

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $651
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback