HP Laptop 17-cp0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
1 month ago, 26 days ago.
SystemHP Laptop 17-cp0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 88C6
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240131
Uptime5 Days
Run DateMay 11 '24 at 05:17
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
FP6, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Memory 67.5
1-Core 130
2-Core 260
82% 153 Pts
4-Core 479
8-Core 603
69% 541 Pts
64-Core 597
37% 597 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 88C6) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.44
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Lighting 12.5
Reflection 8.6
Parallax 17.7
10% 12.9 fps
MRender 8.9
Gravity 15.5
Splatting 14.8
11% 13.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNW512G8H 512GB
311GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,360
Write 928
Mixed 860
232% 1,049 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 76.5
4K Mixed 51
168% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 328
DQ Write 731
DQ Mixed 341
314% 467 MB/s
Poor: 88% Great: 203%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-3G2R1 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
56.8% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 19.8
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 19.1
59% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 17.3" 1280 720 AUO9C92
Typical Laptop 17-cp0xxx Builds (Compare 505 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: HP Laptop 17-cp0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback