Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M1502IA_M1502IA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics13.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
23 days ago, 23 days ago.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M1502IA_M1502IA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M1502IA
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230605
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 11 '24 at 04:14
Run Duration80 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Memory 78
1-Core 133
2-Core 287
89% 166 Pts
4-Core 553
8-Core 293
63% 423 Pts
64-Core 1,284
80% 1,284 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 12DD) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Lighting 16.1
Reflection 25.2
Parallax 20.8
13% 20.7 fps
MRender 13.3
Gravity 19.3
Splatting 17.5
14% 16.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS256GEJ9X108N 256GB
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51002C30
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,688
Write 2,061
Mixed 1,668
405% 1,805 MB/s
4K Read 49
4K Write 94.5
4K Mixed 36.4
171% 60 MB/s
DQ Read 991
DQ Write 644
DQ Mixed 913
655% 849 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 272%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE HEMA851S6DJR6N-XN 8GB
3200, 3200 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.4% Good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 24.2
MC Mixed 20.4
68% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 25.5
SC Mixed 17.9
59% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 90.3
44% 90.3 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 45 12 60 15.5" 1536 793 BOE0903
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M1502IA_M1502IA Builds (Compare 87 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M1502IA_M1502IA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback