Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI_FA707XI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics38.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive227% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI_FA707XI  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA707XI
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230911
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 11 '24 at 03:48
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Memory 70.5
1-Core 124
2-Core 251
80% 148 Pts
4-Core 554
8-Core 883
88% 718 Pts
64-Core 1,464
91% 1,464 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M
Asus(1043 23DD) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 24.4.1
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
38.2% Below average
Lighting 43.9
Reflection 20
Parallax 58.6
36% 40.8 fps
MRender 19.8
Gravity 54.7
Splatting 72.7
43% 49.1 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 53%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00-1002 1TB
569GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 74104000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 987 1056 1087 1566 1550 1587 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
227% Outstanding
Read 2140
Write 1,610
Mixed 1,450
SusWrite 1,305
364% 1,626 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 55.4
4K Mixed 38.7
123% 41.1 MB/s
DQ Read 834
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 673
459% 580 MB/s
Poor: 232%
This bench: 227%
Great: 510%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG66MEBSA095N 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
124% Outstanding
MC Read 44.4
MC Write 46.5
MC Mixed 42.7
127% 44.5 GB/s
SC Read 39.2
SC Write 48.7
SC Mixed 45
127% 44.3 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 105%
This bench: 124%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 46 11 144 17.3" 1280 720 AUODDA7 B173HAN04.9
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI_FA707XI Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 118%
UFO

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI_FA707XI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback