Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics51% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 months ago, 24 days ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121019
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 11 '24 at 03:45
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Memory 79.6
1-Core 56.5
2-Core 112
52% 82.8 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 216
29% 216 Pts
64-Core 217
13% 217 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
MSI(1462 3490) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51% Above average
Lighting 63.8
Reflection 65.7
Parallax 57.5
52% 62.3 fps
MRender 61
Gravity 58.8
Splatting 60
49% 59.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ssd 512GB
345GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP3105A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 76 11 15 18 18 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.6% Poor
Read 214
Write 196
Mixed 87.6
SusWrite 31.3
29% 132 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 48.7
4K Mixed 2.3
60% 23.8 MB/s
DQ Read 26.4
DQ Write 61.1
DQ Mixed 2.5
14% 30 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 96%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
104GB free
Firmware: JU001C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 69 69 70 69 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 134
Write 106
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 68.6
59% 82.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 79%
Seagate BUP Slim SL 2TB
1TB free, PID ab24
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 119 131 133 130 131 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 86.2
Write 96.6
Mixed 84.6
SusWrite 124
137% 97.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
34% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.5% Below average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 13.2
36% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 10.1
24% 8.37 GB/s
Latency 80.6
50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 49 13 60 36.1" 1280 720 TCL0000 55S401
Typical GA-78LMT-USB3 Builds (Compare 1,066 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $238
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback