Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 111%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170623
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateMay 11 '24 at 02:14
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7900X-$393
CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Memory 70.2
1-Core 128
2-Core 247
80% 148 Pts
4-Core 488
8-Core 917
84% 702 Pts
64-Core 1,674
104% 1,674 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
123% Outstanding
Lighting 167
Reflection 190
Parallax 193
136% 183 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 172
Splatting 125
116% 144 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 123%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
380GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 442 440 434 434 437 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 462
Write 449
Mixed 395
SusWrite 439
98% 436 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 82.1
4K Mixed 40.7
134% 49.3 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 354
266% 357 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 103%
Great: 134%
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$165
876GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 446 442 434 435 438 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 476
Write 453
Mixed 431
SusWrite 441
101% 450 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 84.7
4K Mixed 43.3
150% 53.5 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 357
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 108%
Great: 136%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C12 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.1% Very good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 40.8
MC Mixed 23
85% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 9.8
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 23.8" 1280 720 BNQ78D9 BenQ GW2470
Typical GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 367 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $1,000
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback