Gigabyte GA-A620M S2H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 202%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 196%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics224% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A620M S2H  (all builds)
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231128
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 10 '24 at 23:44
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
92% Outstanding
Memory 70.7
1-Core 171
2-Core 326
99% 189 Pts
4-Core 606
8-Core 1,028
99% 817 Pts
64-Core 1,173
73% 1,173 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 92%
Great: 114%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7900-GRE
AMD(1002 0E3B) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.4.1
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
224% Outstanding
Lighting 304
Reflection 343
Parallax 629
248% 425 fps
MRender 334
Gravity 273
Splatting 364
269% 323 fps
Poor: 114%
This bench: 224%
Great: 228%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S1000G 1TB
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBM02103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 459 117 117 111 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 1,588
Write 1,328
Mixed 193
SusWrite 169
180% 819 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 65.2
4K Mixed 16.9
111% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 776
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 176
200% 360 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 126%
Great: 352%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AD5U56008G-B 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 46.9
MC Write 34
MC Mixed 41.1
116% 40.7 GB/s
SC Read 40.1
SC Write 41
SC Mixed 40.9
116% 40.7 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 111%
This bench: 114%
Great: 154%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 41 8 165 27" 2560 1369 SKG2718 H27S17
Typical GA-A620M S2H Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A620M S2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $326
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback