Asrock H81M-HDS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive77.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H81M-HDS  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130909
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 10 '24 at 20:33
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User KAZ-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4130-$41
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
65.6% Good
Memory 90.2
1-Core 90.8
2-Core 163
69% 115 Pts
4-Core 239
8-Core 240
32% 240 Pts
64-Core 239
15% 239 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Asus(1043 84F0) 2GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 551.76
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Lighting 18.1
Reflection 23.5
Parallax 16.6
15% 19.4 fps
MRender 22.6
Gravity 18.7
Splatting 15.6
15% 19 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS340 240GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1001A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 231 49 39 48 44 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Read 493
Write 430
Mixed 415
SusWrite 135
82% 369 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 80.5
4K Mixed 28.7
127% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 47.1
96% 191 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 95%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
528GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 131 143 148 152 150 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Read 135
Write 135
Mixed 18.6
SusWrite 142
78% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot PSD38G16002 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
52.8% Above average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 16.5
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 18.5
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 80.7
50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 16 187 16 75 18.9" 1440 900 GSM4B6F W1942
Typical H81M-HDS Builds (Compare 1,142 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H81M-HDS - $147

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback