Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics98.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231007
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 10 '24 at 20:29
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Memory 80.2
1-Core 143
2-Core 283
91% 169 Pts
4-Core 495
8-Core 867
82% 681 Pts
64-Core 1,105
68% 1,105 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$250
Nvidia(10DE 1536) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.6% Outstanding
Lighting 129
Reflection 115
Parallax 121
105% 122 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 97.9
Splatting 86.3
86% 108 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S70 BLADE 1TB
376GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.2.F.83
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1826
Write 2,354
Mixed 1,850
451% 2,010 MB/s
4K Read 49.1
4K Write 96.8
4K Mixed 64.2
208% 70 MB/s
DQ Read 1,226
DQ Write 835
DQ Mixed 1,018
763% 1,026 MB/s
Poor: 276% Great: 606%
Toshiba MQ01ABU050W 500GB
388GB free
Firmware: FN0A0M
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 107
Write 100
Mixed 32.6
58% 80.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AX4U360038G18I-BB10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
92% Outstanding
MC Read 37.9
MC Write 25.6
MC Mixed 34.9
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 40.7
SC Mixed 27.8
86% 30.1 GB/s
Latency 79.5
50% 79.5 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 92%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 144 23.6" 1280 720 MLT0236 MN101
Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS Builds (Compare 3,611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $713
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback