Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics116% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive265% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II  (all builds)
Memory18.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210113
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 10 '24 at 20:12
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Memory 87.4
1-Core 117
2-Core 246
84% 150 Pts
4-Core 458
8-Core 768
75% 613 Pts
64-Core 964
60% 964 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
Nvidia(10DE 1E87) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
116% Outstanding
Lighting 151
Reflection 150
Parallax 148
123% 150 fps
MRender 174
Gravity 136
Splatting 115
113% 142 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 116%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1TB
567GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1025 1382 1353 1333 1318 1290 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
265% Outstanding
Read 2,234
Write 2,096
Mixed 1,560
SusWrite 1,283
402% 1,793 MB/s
4K Read 52.7
4K Write 95.6
4K Mixed 66.6
216% 71.6 MB/s
DQ Read 795
DQ Write 537
DQ Mixed 642
485% 658 MB/s
Poor: 183%
This bench: 265%
Great: 431%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 121 125 126 123 123 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 107
Write 116
Mixed 69.2
SusWrite 121
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.6
212% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
5.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 157 165 166 161 159 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Read 130
Write 152
Mixed 65.6
SusWrite 158
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.7
233% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43CB1-CRC 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74% Very good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 23.7
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 27.9
SC Mixed 22.4
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 17: 0P 2R 2G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
17% 15% 34 215 58 60 31.5" 1280 720 BNQ7950 BenQ EW3270U
Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II Builds (Compare 644 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $540
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback