Dell Precision Tower 5810

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDell Precision Tower 5810
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 5810  (all builds)
Memory55 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201019
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 10 '24 at 19:53
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2673 v4
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 82
1-Core 98.7
2-Core 192
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 667
61% 512 Pts
64-Core 2140
132% 2140 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.8% Above average
Lighting 64.2
Reflection 61.4
Parallax 87.6
52% 71.1 fps
MRender 63.5
Gravity 70.8
Splatting 46
48% 60.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ST12000NM0128-2H3131 12TB
310GB free
Firmware: RAL2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 147
Write 137
Mixed 87
28% 124 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 1.3
49% 12.2 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 39%
HFS960GDE0X098N 960GB
816GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41081A10
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 917
Write 755
Mixed 826
627% 832 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 74.3
4K Mixed 46.8
8,038% 52.1 MB/s
DQ Read 682
DQ Write 511
DQ Mixed 545
5,149% 579 MB/s
Seagate ST10000NM0016-1T 10TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: SNEA
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 199
Write 202
Mixed 140
134% 180 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 1.3
1,149% 9.27 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36ASF4G72PZ-2G6E1 2x31.5GB
2 of 8 slots used
63GB RIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (92nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.8% Very good
MC Read 33.3
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 27
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 15.8
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 72.3" 1280 720 GSM0001 LG TV SSCR2
Typical Precision Tower 5810 Builds (Compare 5,315 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 5810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $76
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback