MSI X299 TOMAHAWK (MS-7B05)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 153%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 180%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics191% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive81.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B05
MotherboardMSI X299 TOMAHAWK (MS-7B05)  (all builds)
Memory44 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20181204
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 10 '24 at 19:42
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7940X-$654
CPU0, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Memory 76.4
1-Core 117
2-Core 233
78% 142 Pts
4-Core 453
8-Core 875
79% 664 Pts
64-Core 2,090
129% 2,090 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 535.98
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
191% Outstanding
Lighting 282
Reflection 255
Parallax 290
229% 275 fps
MRender 319
Gravity 201
Splatting 174
182% 231 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 191%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 1TB
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT22B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 139 133 143 194 197 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Read 466
Write 131
Mixed 193
SusWrite 166
52% 239 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 90.2
4K Mixed 34
134% 50.7 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 160
144% 226 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 133%
Intel SSDSC2BA800G3 800GB
448GB free
Firmware: 5DV10270
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 385 429 427 425 429 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 361
Write 433
Mixed 353
SusWrite 409
88% 389 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 79.7
4K Mixed 42.2
146% 51.5 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 258
196% 263 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 104%
PNY CS1030 1TB SSD
741GB free
Firmware: CS103C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1491 1043 90 87 89 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
170% Outstanding
Read 970
Write 1,619
Mixed 1,232
SusWrite 482
244% 1,076 MB/s
4K Read 46.2
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 64
219% 78.9 MB/s
DQ Read 842
DQ Write 673
DQ Mixed 827
600% 780 MB/s
Poor: 121%
This bench: 170%
Great: 279%
Seagate ST20000NE000-3G5101 20TB
15.5TB free
Firmware: EN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 255 260 254 256 258 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 72% Great: 91%
WD My Book 25EE 3TB
989GB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 151 149 150 150 147 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 131
Write 134
Mixed 110
SusWrite 150
180% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
106% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 37
MC Write 58.5
MC Mixed 35.1
124% 43.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 10
36% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 85.7
47% 85.7 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 108%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 56 29 120 48.8" 1280 720 SAM71CD LS49A950U
Typical X299 TOMAHAWK (MS-7B05) Builds (Compare 184 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI X299 TOMAHAWK (MS-7B05)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $828
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback