Asus Pro H510M-C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Pro H510M-C  (all builds)
Memory7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 10 '24 at 19:11
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400-$120
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Memory 90.4
1-Core 145
2-Core 286
96% 174 Pts
4-Core 508
8-Core 860
83% 684 Pts
64-Core 1105
68% 1105 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$280
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
123% Outstanding
Lighting 166
Reflection 134
Parallax 157
135% 152 fps
MRender 199
Gravity 132
Splatting 107
115% 146 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 123%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SX6000LNP 256GB
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VC0S036H
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,960
Write 1,080
Mixed 1,151
308% 1,397 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 97.5
4K Mixed 55.4
184% 64.4 MB/s
DQ Read 365
DQ Write 1,018
DQ Mixed 509
441% 630 MB/s
Poor: 105% Great: 228%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
293GB free
Firmware: GH2OA560
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 102
Write 102
Mixed 28.2
56% 77.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
122% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 26% Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
57.4% Above average
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 16.2
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 17.6
53% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 53 22 165 24" 1920 1009 GSM5C01 LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical Pro H510M-C Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus Pro H510M-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 119% - Outstanding Total price: $120
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback