Asus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS WIFI D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 134%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 138%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive294% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS WIFI D4  (all builds)
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211012
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 10 '24 at 19:02
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12600K-$156
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 79.5
1-Core 198
2-Core 384
115% 221 Pts
4-Core 742
8-Core 1,247
121% 995 Pts
64-Core 1,807
112% 1,807 Pts
Poor: 100%
This bench: 109%
Great: 117%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$293
Asus(1043 8919) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
123% Outstanding
Lighting 166
Reflection 115
Parallax 156
136% 146 fps
MRender 207
Gravity 130
Splatting 105
116% 148 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 123%
Great: 127%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT500P3SSD8 500GB
379GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR30A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1819 1822 1821 1433 457 114 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
294% Outstanding
Read 1,461
Write 1,802
Mixed 1546
SusWrite 1244
342% 1,513 MB/s
4K Read 44.8
4K Write 279
4K Mixed 87.1
327% 137 MB/s
DQ Read 1,392
DQ Write 1,276
DQ Mixed 1,078
879% 1,249 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 294%
Great: 305%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2D3600C18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.6% Very good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 26.2
79% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 22.3
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 81.2
49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 23.8" 1920 1057 PHLC212 PHL 241V8
Typical TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS WIFI D4 Builds (Compare 3,940 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS WIFI D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $476
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback