Asus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 171%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 117%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive386% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory120.8 GB free of 128 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240204
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 10 '24 at 18:42
Run Duration330 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X-$319
AM5, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Memory 76.6
1-Core 217
2-Core 425
123% 239 Pts
4-Core 835
8-Core 1,652
147% 1,244 Pts
64-Core 2,880
178% 2,880 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 117%
Great: 126%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700-XT-$480
Sapphire(1DA2 E445) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 24.4.1
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
121% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 134
Parallax 285
109% 184 fps
MRender 233
Gravity 146
Splatting 201
158% 193 fps
Poor: 113%
This bench: 121%
Great: 129%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fanxiang S770 2TB
804GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.W.J.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2696 2739 2735 2753 2753 2749 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
386% Outstanding
Read 1,884
Write 2,808
Mixed 2,179
SusWrite 2,737
546% 2,402 MB/s
4K Read 55.2
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 62.9
239% 86.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1770
DQ Write 1,401
DQ Mixed 1,572
1,180% 1,581 MB/s
Poor: 257%
This bench: 386%
Great: 629%
Toshiba Q300 960GB
849GB free
Firmware: SAFM11.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 93 115 115 104 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Read 517
Write 136
Mixed 414
SusWrite 117
66% 296 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 74.3
4K Mixed 32.6
126% 45.5 MB/s
DQ Read 339
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 84.3
106% 194 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 90%
Toshiba Q300 960GB
210GB free
Firmware: SAFM11.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 96 105 103 122 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 516
Write 474
Mixed 375
SusWrite 119
83% 371 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 74.8
4K Mixed 37.4
132% 47.3 MB/s
DQ Read 336
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 43
90% 188 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 90%
Lexar NM620 2TB
147GB free
Firmware: 9846
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2157 1489 484 303 268 273 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
260% Outstanding
Read 1,898
Write 2,363
Mixed 1,944
SusWrite 829
396% 1,759 MB/s
4K Read 53.5
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 65.8
221% 74.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,785
DQ Write 1,131
DQ Mixed 637
696% 1,184 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 260%
Great: 386%
Sandisk S3 500G 500GB
331GB free
Firmware: 415020RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 279 220 217 217 220 217 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 464
Mixed 228
SusWrite 228
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 98.6
4K Mixed 49.4
169% 61.2 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 185
179% 285 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 102%
Great: 116%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
232GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1281 350 313 311 312 312 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
224% Outstanding
Read 2,049
Write 1,232
Mixed 582
SusWrite 480
239% 1,086 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 56.8
207% 76.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,093
DQ Write 1,129
DQ Mixed 716
647% 979 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 224%
Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT32G48C40U5.M16A1 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
138% Outstanding
MC Read 53.7
MC Write 43
MC Mixed 54
144% 50.2 GB/s
SC Read 45.1
SC Write 45.9
SC Mixed 44.9
129% 45.3 GB/s
Latency 85.7
47% 85.7 ns
Poor: 116%
This bench: 138%
Great: 161%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 31.5" 1280 720 SKG3212 Q3212RUC
Typical TUF GAMING B650-PLUS Builds (Compare 181 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 196%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 199%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $960
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback