HP Z640 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z640 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 212A
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180808
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 10 '24 at 18:25
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 77.6
1-Core 94.2
2-Core 186
68% 119 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 653
60% 502 Pts
64-Core 1,661
103% 1,661 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000
HP(103C 1153) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.40
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.8% Below average
Lighting 37.8
Reflection 41.1
Parallax 36.3
31% 38.4 fps
MRender 49.8
Gravity 36.1
Splatting 39
34% 41.6 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM851 2.5 7mm 256GB
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT08D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 244 251 253 251 253 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Read 442
Write 256
Mixed 182
SusWrite 249
63% 282 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 57.1
4K Mixed 21.4
90% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 344
DQ Write 253
DQ Mixed 76.5
117% 224 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18ASF1G72PZ-2G1A2 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
61.9% Good
MC Read 26.6
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 20
65% 22.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 17.1
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 85.6
47% 85.6 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 27.2" 1920 1009 GSM5A4A 24MB35
Typical Z640 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,606 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: HP Z640 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 16% - Very poor Total price: $509
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback