Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	73.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

24 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 23 days ago, 23 days ago.

System	Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX504GD
Memory	11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210823
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	May 10 '24 at 17:29
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	BOL-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8300H 167,898 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	64.4% Good	Memory 82.8 1-Core 99.7 2-Core 181 71% 121 Pts	4-Core 250 8-Core 355 38% 303 Pts	64-Core 367 23% 367 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 10C1) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111 Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	3.85% Terrible	Lighting 4.4 Reflection 6.5 Parallax 5.5 4% 5.47 fps	MRender 7.6 Gravity 0.2 Splatting 7.5 4% 5.1 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.85% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GB 50,765 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 151GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0MA031 SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 354 310 146 146 106 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	73.5% Very good	Read 426 Write 351 Mixed 354 SusWrite 237 77% 342 MB/s	4K Read 21.6 4K Write 54.9 4K Mixed 29.8 100% 35.4 MB/s	DQ Read 236 DQ Write 251 DQ Mixed 268 195% 252 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 91%
Toshiba HDWL110 1TB 7,333 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 281GB free Firmware: JU000A SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 105 106 106 110 97 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	68.7% Good	Read 133 Write 133 Mixed 53.5 SusWrite 105 77% 106 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 5.3 4K Mixed 0.7 238% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 68.7% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 859B CT8G4SFRA266.C4FE 16GB 58 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	66.3% Good	MC Read 24.8 MC Write 25.1 MC Mixed 19.4 66% 23.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 29.2 SC Mixed 20.2 62% 21.6 GB/s	Latency 76 53% 76 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 66.3% Great: 74%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	67	56	60	15.5"	1280 720	LGD0570

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD Builds (Compare 2,639 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

CPU
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	1,713x
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	926x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,576x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	1,062x
RX 5700-XTAMD $250Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	1x

SSD
RBUSNS8154P3128GJ 128GBKingstonBench 81%, 18,233 samples	325x
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ 256GBKingstonBench 96%, 18,615 samples	122x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	112x

RAM
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples	883x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	221x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	81x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16