Asus PRIME B460M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B460M-A  (all builds)
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210709
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 10 '24 at 15:55
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10600-$137
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Memory 88.7
1-Core 141
2-Core 274
93% 168 Pts
4-Core 538
8-Core 896
87% 717 Pts
64-Core 1,100
68% 1,100 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
Asus(1043 8810) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 120
Parallax 126
110% 127 fps
MRender 144
Gravity 103
Splatting 89
89% 112 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 102%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$44
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 237 239 229 220 221 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 404
Write 484
Mixed 452
SusWrite 230
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 53.4
182% 65.4 MB/s
DQ Read 290
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 198
180% 272 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 101%
Great: 128%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
94GB free
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,051
Write 1,896
Mixed 1,434
330% 1,460 MB/s
4K Read 51.1
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 72.1
249% 91.2 MB/s
DQ Read 697
DQ Write 757
DQ Mixed 671
520% 708 MB/s
Poor: 144% Great: 295%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
188GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 722 402 404 402 401 403 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
184% Outstanding
Read 1,540
Write 2,228
Mixed 1,347
SusWrite 456
314% 1,393 MB/s
4K Read 54.4
4K Write 188
4K Mixed 71.6
274% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 53
DQ Write 407
DQ Mixed 688
396% 383 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 184%
Great: 302%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
515GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 126 124 122 126 123 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 16.5
Write 116
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 123
50% 68.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.6
29% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.2% Very good
MC Read 31.2
MC Write 30.1
MC Mixed 21.9
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 22
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 27" 1280 720 IVM6637 PL2792Q
Typical PRIME B460M-A Builds (Compare 4,484 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B460M-A - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $718
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback