Asus ROG STRIX Z590-F GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics192% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z590-F GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory18.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210518
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateMay 10 '24 at 15:27
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700K-$224
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
79.2% Very good
Memory 76.8
1-Core 112
2-Core 219
76% 136 Pts
4-Core 438
8-Core 696
70% 567 Pts
64-Core 1,142
71% 1,142 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700
Palit(1569 2206) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
192% Outstanding
Lighting 279
Reflection 257
Parallax 319
227% 285 fps
MRender 326
Gravity 235
Splatting 173
192% 245 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 192%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
376GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,307
Write 2,007
Mixed 1,659
443% 1,991 MB/s
4K Read 50.8
4K Write 89.9
4K Mixed 61.4
203% 67.4 MB/s
DQ Read 828
DQ Write 471
DQ Mixed 633
475% 644 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
Intel 670p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$79
252GB free
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,479
Write 1,796
Mixed 1411
419% 1,895 MB/s
4K Read 58.9
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 74.9
252% 86.5 MB/s
DQ Read 831
DQ Write 632
DQ Mixed 586
478% 683 MB/s
Poor: 137% Great: 383%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 15.5
Write 8
Mixed 8
2% 10.5 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.8
8% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 97%
Seagate Desktop 8TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 040B
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 17
Write 41.7
Mixed 26.2
21% 28.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.1
23% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 93%
SDXC Card 128GB
99GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 16.7
Write 13.7
Mixed 11.2
17% 13.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 2.1
119% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 45%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 5TB
390GB free, PID d011
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 84.7
Write 117
Mixed 56.3
112% 86 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
123% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMU16GX4M2A2666C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
65% Good
MC Read 23.6
MC Write 25.4
MC Mixed 20.7
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 20.1
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 81.6
49% 81.6 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 23.5" 1280 720 SAM0D2C C24F390
Typical ROG STRIX Z590-F GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 2,947 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 203%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 203%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z590-F GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $1,091
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback