Asus X751LD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus X751LD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X751LD
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190419
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 10 '24 at 15:22
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4210U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
49.6% Average
Memory 71
1-Core 67.1
2-Core 114
52% 84.1 Pts
4-Core 166
8-Core 167
22% 166 Pts
64-Core 170
11% 170 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 820M
Asus(1043 15AD) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9135
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
4.2% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 8.9
Parallax 4.8
4% 6.27 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 5.2
4% 5.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.2%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR054
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 393 359 361 385 390 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
68.5% Good
Read 448
Write 395
Mixed 374
SusWrite 348
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 58.3
4K Mixed 15.3
84% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 66.1
DQ Mixed 0.9
28% 70.5 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.1% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 15
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 13.4
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 88.6
45% 88.6 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 60 17.3" 1280 720 CMN1728
Typical X751LD Builds (Compare 240 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X751LD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Average Total price: $308
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback