MSI MS-16R5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
3 months ago, 24 days ago.
SystemMicro-Star GF63 Thin 10SC
MotherboardMSI MS-16R5  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210514
Uptime5.2 Days
Run DateMay 10 '24 at 15:18
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Memory 84.4
1-Core 128
2-Core 256
86% 156 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 724
75% 602 Pts
64-Core 905
56% 905 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 12F4) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
4.43% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 8.5
Parallax 7.1
5% 7.2 fps
MRender 9.2
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 0.1
4% 5 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.43%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AI1 512GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFK52.8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 108 69 88 81 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 822
Write 774
Mixed 807
SusWrite 86.3
139% 622 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 77.7
4K Mixed 1.9
93% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 103
DQ Write 86.5
DQ Mixed 129
87% 106 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 203%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.3% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 10.6
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 12.7
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 83.1
48% 83.1 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 42 7 60 15.5" 1536 793 AUO4999
Typical MS-16R5 Builds (Compare 4,829 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16R5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback