Asus ROG Strix G733PZV_G733PZV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics7.94% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive282% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
25 days ago, 24 days ago.
SystemAsus ROG Strix G733PZV_G733PZV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G733PZV
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 10 '24 at 15:09
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D Graphics
FL1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Memory 73.1
1-Core 173
2-Core 328
101% 192 Pts
4-Core 668
8-Core 1,087
107% 877 Pts
64-Core 2,364
146% 2,364 Pts
Poor: 101%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 117%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 610M
Asus(1043 1A93) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.40.38.08
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
7.94% Terrible
Lighting 7.5
Reflection 13.7
Parallax 11.5
6% 10.9 fps
MRender 10.9
Gravity 8
Splatting 20.5
12% 13.1 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.94%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS001TEJ9X101N 1TB
837GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51000A20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1846 1789 1813 1722 1727 1696 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
282% Outstanding
Read 2,714
Write 1,762
Mixed 1,845
SusWrite 1,765
452% 2,022 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 56.3
4K Mixed 40.5
140% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 810
DQ Write 221
DQ Mixed 751
492% 594 MB/s
Poor: 156%
This bench: 282%
Great: 531%
WD Black SN850X NVMe PCIe M.2 4TB-$293
3.5TB free
Firmware: 624361WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2027 1905 1941 1972 1934 1968 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
294% Outstanding
Read 2,693
Write 1,742
Mixed 2,099
SusWrite 1,958
476% 2,123 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 57
4K Mixed 38.7
138% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 837
DQ Write 247
DQ Mixed 738
493% 608 MB/s
Poor: 292%
This bench: 294%
Great: 682%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R2GA3PB0-CWMOL 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (100th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
263% Outstanding
MC Read 230
MC Write 39.4
MC Mixed 54.2
309% 108 GB/s
SC Read 35.4
SC Write 34.9
SC Mixed 34.9
100% 35.1 GB/s
Latency 94.4
42% 94.4 ns
Poor: 127%
This bench: 263%
Great: 179%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 1: 0P 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
1% 9% 11 217 57 60 17.2" 1280 720 BOE0B69 NE173QHM-NZ2
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback