Asrock Z790 PG SONIC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics29.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive466% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock Z790 PG SONIC  (all builds)
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240416
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 10 '24 at 14:25
Run Duration310 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700KF-$189
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 77.6
1-Core 188
2-Core 386
112% 217 Pts
4-Core 757
8-Core 1428
130% 1,093 Pts
64-Core 2,158
134% 2,158 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 110%
Great: 121%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85CD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 551.76
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.4% Poor
Lighting 37.7
Reflection 39.3
Parallax 37.2
31% 38.1 fps
MRender 36.4
Gravity 38.7
Splatting 26
27% 33.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000T700SSD3 1TB
756GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PACR5102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2961 2383 969 982 987 905 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
466% Outstanding
Read 4,723
Write 4849
Mixed 3,008
SusWrite 1531
789% 3,528 MB/s
4K Read 85.4
4K Write 229
4K Mixed 123
408% 146 MB/s
DQ Read 1566
DQ Write 985
DQ Mixed 1299
962% 1,283 MB/s
Poor: 434%
This bench: 466%
Great: 723%
Intel 750 Series NVMe PCIe 400GB-$550
143GB free
Firmware: 8EV101H0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 932 929 957 972 969 965 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
233% Outstanding
Read 959
Write 1006
Mixed 654
SusWrite 954
201% 893 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 226
4K Mixed 56.7
260% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1663
DQ Write 965
DQ Mixed 997
827% 1,208 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 233%
Great: 230%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
115GB free
Firmware: 005C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 871 102 104 109 103 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
197% Outstanding
Read 1,519
Write 1462
Mixed 1,061
SusWrite 232
238% 1,069 MB/s
4K Read 59.1
4K Write 173
4K Mixed 81.2
285% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 636
DQ Write 884
DQ Mixed 468
435% 663 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 197%
Great: 255%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB
148GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,799
Write 2524
Mixed 2331
569% 2,551 MB/s
4K Read 73.2
4K Write 184
4K Mixed 103
341% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1,722
DQ Write 1,195
DQ Mixed 1,428
1,074% 1,448 MB/s
Poor: 182% Great: 389%
Kingston SNA-DC/U 250GB
173GB free, PID 6298
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 35 35 35 35 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 53.9
Write 35.1
Mixed 37.5
SusWrite 35.2
52% 40.4 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 10.8
4K Mixed 14.8
936% 14.4 MB/s
DQ Read 14
DQ Write 16.6
DQ Mixed 15.3
1,137% 15.3 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F5-6000J3636F162x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
156% Outstanding
MC Read 63.8
MC Write 61.4
MC Mixed 57.1
174% 60.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 50.2
SC Mixed 27.7
93% 32.5 GB/s
Latency 89.7
45% 89.7 ns
Poor: 134%
This bench: 156%
Great: 199%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 52 60 35" 2560 1009 BNQ7F46 BenQ XR3501
Typical Z790 PG SONIC Builds (Compare 413 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 189%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 125%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 246%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z790 PG SONIC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $1,068
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback