Lenovo 83AX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics25.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 83AX  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory3.6 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230727
Uptime4 Days
Run DateMay 10 '24 at 13:57
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Memory 60.9
1-Core 166
2-Core 308
93% 179 Pts
4-Core 554
8-Core 864
87% 709 Pts
64-Core 977
60% 977 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RadeonT 680M
Legend(17AA 381F) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 23.10.24.02
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.8% Poor
Lighting 33.2
Reflection 47
Parallax 59.5
27% 46.6 fps
MRender 26.1
Gravity 34.7
Splatting 25.9
23% 28.9 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 34%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$169
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0B2QJXG7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1930
Write 3,578
Mixed 2,940
637% 2816 MB/s
4K Read 65.5
4K Write 98.8
4K Mixed 72.2
244% 78.8 MB/s
DQ Read 714
DQ Write 427
DQ Mixed 675
475% 606 MB/s
Poor: 299% Great: 592%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H58G56AK6BX069 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
MC Read 31.7
MC Write 41.9
MC Mixed 34.9
103% 36.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 41.9
SC Mixed 25
82% 28.6 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 23.8" 1280 720 AUS240C VA24D
Typical 83AX Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Lenovo 83AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback