PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 3.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 41.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock P55 Pro/USB3 (all builds) |
Memory | 4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110118 |
Uptime | 5.9 Days |
Run Date | May 10 '24 at 13:42 |
Run Duration | 118 Seconds |
Run User | NLD-User |
Background CPU | 8% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
48.1%
Average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R7 240
MSI(1462 8094) 2GB
CLim: 600 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.20
|
3.55%
Terrible
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Transcend SSD320 128GB-$92
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.6.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 84 95 88 88 82 MB/s
|
41.6%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 8GB
0, 0, 0 MHz
4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
18%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 38 | 4 | 60 | 21.5" | 1280 720 | SAM09C4 S22C450 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples | 19x |
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 9x |
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples | 5x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce GT 430NvidiaBench 3%, 22,369 samples | 4x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 3x |
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 68% - Good | Total price: $139 |