Asrock P55 Pro/USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock P55 Pro/USB3  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110118
Uptime5.9 Days
Run DateMay 10 '24 at 13:42
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$70
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
48.1% Average
Memory 62.6
1-Core 82.4
2-Core 148
56% 97.5 Pts
4-Core 196
8-Core 195
26% 196 Pts
64-Core 192
12% 192 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
MSI(1462 8094) 2GB
CLim: 600 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
3.55% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 4
Parallax 6.5
4% 5.03 fps
MRender 3.4
Gravity 5.1
Splatting 3.3
3% 3.93 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.55%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD320 128GB-$92
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.6.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 84 95 88 88 82 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 192
Write 125
Mixed 148
SusWrite 88.9
31% 138 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 46.7
4K Mixed 24.3
83% 29.7 MB/s
DQ Read 26.5
DQ Write 89.3
DQ Mixed 35.1
34% 50.3 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
0, 0, 0 MHz
4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18% Very poor
MC Read 4.9
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 5.7
16% 5.73 GB/s
SC Read 4.7
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 5.5
15% 5.4 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 18%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 38 4 60 21.5" 1280 720 SAM09C4 S22C450
Typical P55 Pro/USB3 Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock P55 Pro/USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $139
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback