Razer Blade 17 (2022) - RZ09-0423

Performance Results


Gaming 128% UFO	Desktop 104% UFO	Workstation 123% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	346% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

1 month ago, 27 days ago.

System	Razer Blade 17 (2022) - RZ09-0423 (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer DI780
Memory	45.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20231006
Uptime	6 Days
Run Date	May 10 '24 at 12:03
Run Duration	193 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-12900H 15,403 User benchmarks, average bench 99% U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	94.8% Outstanding	Memory 70.3 1-Core 184 2-Core 369 107% 208 Pts	4-Core 643 8-Core 900 97% 772 Pts	64-Core 1,383 86% 1,383 Pts
Poor: 95% ↑ This bench: 94.8% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU 8,682 User benchmarks, average bench 122% Device(1A58 3005) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1233 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	132% Outstanding	Lighting 186 Reflection 184 Parallax 169 151% 180 fps	MRender 186 Gravity 136 Splatting 121 118% 148 fps
Poor: 100% ↑ This bench: 132% Great: 136%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP1000GM30013 1TB 5,778 User benchmarks, average bench 382% 687GB free (System drive) Firmware: SU6SM005 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2169 1841 1373 1271 1217 1497 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	346% Outstanding	Read 2,289 Write 3,755 Mixed 2,563 SusWrite 1,561 576% 2,542 MB/s	4K Read 55.3 4K Write 204 4K Mixed 111 334% 123 MB/s	DQ Read 1,468 DQ Write 918 DQ Mixed 1,201 893% 1,195 MB/s
Poor: 236% ↑ This bench: 346% Great: 508%
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00B00 1TB 21,743 User benchmarks, average bench 345% 739GB free Firmware: GXA7801Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 2298 2759 2717 2704 2052 1612 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	397% Outstanding	Read 2,427 Write 2673 Mixed 2,593 SusWrite 2,357 568% 2,513 MB/s	4K Read 75.1 4K Write 167 4K Mixed 110 343% 117 MB/s	DQ Read 1,346 DQ Write 824 DQ Mixed 1,145 837% 1,105 MB/s
Poor: 192% ↑ This bench: 397% Great: 444%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G Skill Intl F5-4800S3838A322x31.5GB 45 User benchmarks, average bench 150% 2 of 2 slots used 63GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	142% Outstanding	MC Read 59 MC Write 51.7 MC Mixed 55.7 158% 55.5 GB/s	SC Read 18.1 SC Write 44.8 SC Mixed 27.9 86% 30.3 GB/s	Latency 98.6 41% 98.6 ns
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 142% Great: 165%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	66	54	240	17.2"	1280 720	BOE09F9

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade 17 (2022) - RZ09-0423 Builds (Compare 437 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 27%

Raft

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 28%

Raft

System: Razer Blade 17 (2022) - RZ09-0423

CPU
Core i9-12900HIntelBench 99%, 15,403 samples	229x
Core i7-12800HIntelBench 98%, 2,192 samples	207x
Core i7-12700HIntelBench 97%, 52,857 samples	1x

GPU
Iris Xe GraphicsIntelBench 16%, 72,765 samples	182x
RTX 3080-Ti (Laptop)NvidiaBench 133%, 3,063 samples	97x
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPUNvidiaBench 122%, 8,682 samples	70x

SSD
MZVL21T0HCLR-00B00 1TBSamsungBench 345%, 21,743 samples	234x
CA6-8D1024 1TBNvmeBench 308%, 2,261 samples	105x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $160Bench 416%, 138,083 samples	24x

RAM
M425R2GA3BB0-CQKOL 2x16GBSamsungBench 130%, 9,018 samples	169x
M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 2x8GBSamsungBench 120%, 26,893 samples	88x
M425R2GA3BB0-CQKOD 2x16GBSamsungBench 132%, 2,622 samples	38x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16