Asus CM6731_CM6431_CM6331

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics48.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus CM6731_CM6431_CM6331  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CM6731_CM6431_CM6331
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120530
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 10 '24 at 12:03
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770S-$95
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Memory 80.7
1-Core 76.8
2-Core 133
59% 96.9 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 195
26% 194 Pts
64-Core 201
12% 201 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.9% Average
Lighting 60.8
Reflection 60.9
Parallax 87.3
50% 69.7 fps
MRender 62.9
Gravity 72.2
Splatting 45.1
48% 60.1 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP S700 250GB-$31
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0704A1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 148 42 31 28 31 MB/s
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.1% Below average
Read 215
Write 194
Mixed 195
SusWrite 75.6
38% 170 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 35.5
4K Mixed 17.9
74% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 30.4
DQ Write 76.3
DQ Mixed 24.8
27% 43.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 98%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
898GB free
Firmware: CC4C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 175 173 174 176 177 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 100
Mixed 79.5
SusWrite 174
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
169% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 101%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BA160B.C16 830B M2F8G64CB8HB5N-DI 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.3% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 18
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 15.4
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 100 23.5" 1280 720 ACI24C3 ASUS VN247
Typical CM6731_CM6431_CM6331 Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Asus CM6731_CM6431_CM6331

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $144
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback