MSI MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics195% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
28 days ago, 28 days ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C35
MotherboardMSI MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35)  (all builds)
Memory56.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230301
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 10 '24 at 10:11
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 90.6
1-Core 173
2-Core 334
107% 199 Pts
4-Core 667
8-Core 982
103% 825 Pts
64-Core 1,098
68% 1,098 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 107%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6900-XT-$1,000
PowerColor(148C 2408) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.4.1
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
195% Outstanding
Lighting 242
Reflection 249
Parallax 528
197% 340 fps
MRender 405
Gravity 212
Splatting 331
258% 316 fps
Poor: 177%
This bench: 195%
Great: 209%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 PRO with Heatsink 4TB
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,103
Write 4,123
Mixed 3,370
794% 3,532 MB/s
4K Read 80.1
4K Write 174
4K Mixed 107
350% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1,182
DQ Write 876
DQ Mixed 1,016
763% 1,025 MB/s
Poor: 268% Great: 635%
Corsair Force MP600 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$164
690GB free
Firmware: EGFM11.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,985
Write 3,550
Mixed 2,229
584% 2,588 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 74.6
244% 89.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1382
DQ Write 1,053
DQ Mixed 1,295
947% 1,243 MB/s
Poor: 182% Great: 472%
CT2000BX500SSD1 2TB
668GB free
Firmware: M6CR030
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 507
Write 425
Mixed 67.2
73% 333 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 40.7
4K Mixed 0.7
60% 22.1 MB/s
DQ Read 193
DQ Write 36.6
DQ Mixed 0.7
30% 76.7 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 99%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 152
Write 130
Mixed 79.7
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 42
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 37.8
102% 35.6 GB/s
SC Read 31.5
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 38.5
92% 32.2 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 100%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 120 34.8" 1280 720 SAM72F2 Odyssey G85SB
Typical MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35) Builds (Compare 2,509 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35) - $320

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $1,385
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback