Asus Z97-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive73.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z97-A  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140508
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 10 '24 at 09:57
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User EST-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790S-$60
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 85.9
1-Core 91.2
2-Core 173
69% 117 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 404
46% 359 Pts
64-Core 462
29% 462 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.61
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
100% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 134
Parallax 125
103% 129 fps
MRender 110
Gravity 132
Splatting 112
96% 118 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 100%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M500 240GB-$79
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 151 158 163 152 152 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 405
Write 265
Mixed 293
SusWrite 157
62% 280 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 70.7
4K Mixed 31.9
112% 41.6 MB/s
DQ Read 307
DQ Write 263
DQ Mixed 186
166% 252 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 91%
Seagate Expansion Desk 16TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 145 146 145 138 136 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
27.3% Poor
Read 199
Write 195
Mixed 167
SusWrite 141
40% 176 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 10.8
4K Mixed 1.3
39% 11 MB/s
DQ Read 3.6
DQ Write 7.5
DQ Mixed 1.7
2% 4.27 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 38%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
784GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 157 150 158 156 156 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 179
Mixed 37
SusWrite 155
99% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
127% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 107%
Hitachi HDS721010KLA330 1TB-$47
930GB free
Firmware: GKAOA70M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 70 70 70 70 70 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 76.8
Write 81.5
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 69.9
50% 68.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 46%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$99
1TB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 135 151 147 148 156 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 40.9
Write 121
Mixed 26.6
SusWrite 142
60% 82.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.1
28% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 108%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
640GB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 116 141 119 142 137 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 68.5
Write 21.1
Mixed 16
SusWrite 116
40% 55.3 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.3
118% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.4% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 17
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 16.4
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 41 8 75 34.1" 1280 720 GSM7770 LG ULTRAWIDE
Typical Z97-A Builds (Compare 5,064 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-A - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $798
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback