Acer Predator PHN16-71

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive470% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Predator PHN16-71  (all builds)
MotherboardRPL Compass_RTX
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 10 '24 at 09:41
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User NPL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 60.2
1-Core 200
2-Core 393
110% 218 Pts
4-Core 777
8-Core 1,449
133% 1,113 Pts
64-Core 1,585
98% 1,585 Pts
Poor: 106%
This bench: 103%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 170F) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4146
Relative performance n/a - GPU benchmark error
Poor: 6% Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_3400_MTFDKBA1T0TFH 1TB
896GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7MA000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4046 4043 4021 3291 1331 1856 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
470% Outstanding
Read 3,400
Write 3,854
Mixed 2,671
SusWrite 3,098
734% 3,256 MB/s
4K Read 59.3
4K Write 189
4K Mixed 87.3
302% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,249
DQ Write 1,084
DQ Mixed 1162
872% 1,165 MB/s
Poor: 196%
This bench: 470%
Great: 540%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MTC8C1084S1SC48BA1 B 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
62.7% Good
MC Read 24.2
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 24.9
68% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 11.8
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 189
21% 189 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 42 16 165 16" 1280 720 BOE0A2C
Typical Predator PHN16-71 Builds (Compare 1,400 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO

System: Acer Predator PHN16-71

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback