HP EliteDesk 705 G5 Desktop Mini

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics12.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive77.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteDesk 705 G5 Desktop Mini  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8619
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220412
Uptime9.8 Days
Run DateMay 10 '24 at 09:00
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G Vega Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
50% Average
Memory 49
1-Core 98.8
2-Core 174
58% 107 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 445
44% 360 Pts
64-Core 490
30% 490 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 50%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 11 Graphics
HP(103C 8619) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.20.42.09
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Lighting 15.8
Reflection 12.9
Parallax 24.1
13% 17.6 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 23
Splatting 14.5
12% 14.4 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS256G32TNF-N3A0A 256GB
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 70000P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 249 228 218 212 233 258 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
77.6% Very good
Read 398
Write 427
Mixed 260
SusWrite 233
74% 329 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 75.9
4K Mixed 28.9
110% 42.1 MB/s
DQ Read 319
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 209
184% 276 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CWE 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.9% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 8.4
26% 8.93 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 7.2
21% 7.5 GB/s
Latency 242
16% 242 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 47 29 60 23.5" 1920 1017 VSC732E VA2446 Series
Typical EliteDesk 705 G5 Desktop Mini Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 705 G5 Desktop Mini

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback