HP Laptop 15-da0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 15-da0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84A6
Memory0.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210203
Uptime24.5 Days
Run DateMay 10 '24 at 07:26
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User LBN-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
61.4% Good
Memory 72.4
1-Core 94.5
2-Core 139
61% 102 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 302
39% 296 Pts
64-Core 294
18% 294 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
HP(103C 84A6) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
3.73% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 4
Parallax 7.6
5% 5.93 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0
1% 1.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.73%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS500GSSD220Q 500GB
311GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 152 7.5 35 155 7.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 406
Write 250
Mixed 329
SusWrite 104
61% 272 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 43.6
4K Mixed 14.4
64% 24.4 MB/s
DQ Read 105
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 39.6
62% 115 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244BB0-CRC 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.4% Poor
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 6.8
24% 8.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 7.6
21% 7.47 GB/s
Latency 96.6
41% 96.6 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 18: 0P 1R 3G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
18% 9% 90 51 14 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE06A5
Typical Laptop 15-da0xxx Builds (Compare 4,871 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-da0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback