TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics72.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
28 days ago, 4 hrs ago, 3 hrs ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210713
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMay 10 '24 at 06:26
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700F-$180
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Memory 90.2
1-Core 144
2-Core 285
95% 173 Pts
4-Core 564
8-Core 1,025
95% 795 Pts
64-Core 1,493
92% 1,493 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑
This bench: 97.7%
 Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M6000
Nvidia(10DE 1129) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1152 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.8% Very good
Lighting 90.4
Reflection 107
Parallax 96
74% 97.8 fps
MRender 89.3
Gravity 91.5
Splatting 81.4
71% 87.4 fps
Poor: 68% ↑
This bench: 72.8%
 Great: 77%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
768GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 430 434 441 425 269 294 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 381
Write 460
Mixed 383
SusWrite 382
91% 402 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 89.6
4K Mixed 52.9
174% 60.4 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 155
172% 291 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑
This bench: 109%
 Great: 125%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$93
2.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 164 166 164 166 165 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Read 165
Write 164
Mixed 95
SusWrite 165
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
214% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑
This bench: 94.6%
 Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL16G32C16U4B.16FE 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
86.4% Excellent
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 33.2
MC Mixed 26.6
88% 30.7 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 38.1
SC Mixed 25.6
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 71% ↑
This bench: 86.4%
 Great: 117%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 34" 1280 720 LEN66A1 LEN G34w-10
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 10,927 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI

CPU
Core i7-11700KIntel  $231Bench 101%, 65,651 samples3,860x
Core i5-11600KIntel  $180Bench 99%, 43,966 samples1,293x
Core i9-11900KIntel  $254Bench 103%, 44,319 samples1,189x
GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia  $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples1,196x
RTX 3080Nvidia  $700Bench 187%, 424,051 samples1,183x
RTX 3060Nvidia  $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples949x
SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $105Bench 394%, 276,089 samples914x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples711x
670p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel  $79Bench 251%, 14,932 samples494x
RAM
Skill Intl F4-3200C16-16GTZR 2x16GBGBench 91%, 10,357 samples353x
CMW32GX4M2D3600C18 2x16GBCorsairBench 96%, 45,582 samples313x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair  $63Bench 85%, 86,372 samples306x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $836
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback