Lenovo 82WM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 82WM  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory5.1 GB free of 16 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230628
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMay 10 '24 at 04:43
Run Duration91 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
FL1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
60.9% Good
Memory 63.6
1-Core 77.6
2-Core 152
56% 97.6 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 574
53% 443 Pts
64-Core 880
54% 880 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 610M
Legend(17AA 3C51) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.40.05.19
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
7.3% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 12.2
Parallax 12.1
6% 10.4 fps
MRender 9.7
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 19.6
11% 12.2 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.3%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00BL2 1TB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CL1QGXA7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,291
Write 2,011
Mixed 1,390
421% 1,898 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 49.5
189% 70.2 MB/s
DQ Read 881
DQ Write 674
DQ Mixed 792
588% 782 MB/s
Poor: 201% Great: 458%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CWMOD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
93.9% Outstanding
MC Read 38.1
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 34.7
100% 34.8 GB/s
SC Read 26.7
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 30
79% 27.7 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 106%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 146%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 52 29 240 16" 1280 720 BOE0B11
Typical 82WM Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO

System: Lenovo 82WM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback