Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_TUF516PM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics84.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive175% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_TUF516PM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX516PM
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230515
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 10 '24 at 04:30
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11370H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Memory 71.7
1-Core 153
2-Core 276
90% 167 Pts
4-Core 441
8-Core 631
67% 536 Pts
64-Core 632
39% 632 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Asus(1043 16E2) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.5222
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
84.2% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 110
Parallax 105
90% 109 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 84.7
Splatting 78.9
74% 92.4 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 105%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GB
263GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7201Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1102 1114 118 130 49 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
175% Outstanding
Read 1,325
Write 1,228
Mixed 1,136
SusWrite 452
232% 1,035 MB/s
4K Read 45.1
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 59.3
204% 72.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,018
DQ Write 403
DQ Mixed 824
580% 748 MB/s
Poor: 111%
This bench: 175%
Great: 253%
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
676GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1184 1515 1527 1308 1299 1260 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
267% Outstanding
Read 1,942
Write 1434
Mixed 1,430
SusWrite 1,349
345% 1,538 MB/s
4K Read 58.8
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 71.1
244% 83.2 MB/s
DQ Read 978
DQ Write 445
DQ Mixed 839
588% 754 MB/s
Poor: 165%
This bench: 267%
Great: 421%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.9% Above average
MC Read 23.9
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 15.6
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 22.9
SC Mixed 15.4
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 21 1 144 15.5" 1536 801 NCP004D
Typical ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_TUF516PM Builds (Compare 532 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

System: Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_TUF516PM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback