Dell OptiPlex 3000

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.81% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive140% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDell OptiPlex 3000
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 3000  (all builds)
Memory2.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240130
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateMay 09 '24 at 23:48
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
12th Gen Intel Core i5-12500T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 70.8
1-Core 175
2-Core 305
98% 184 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 776
72% 599 Pts
64-Core 967
60% 967 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 770
Dell(1028 0AC5) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4953
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
5.81% Terrible
Lighting 9
Reflection 13.5
Parallax 10.1
7% 10.9 fps
MRender 12.1
Gravity 0.1
Splatting 0.2
3% 4.13 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.81%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KBG40ZNS256G KIOXIA 256GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10410106 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 183 108 121 303 400 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
140% Outstanding
Read 1,043
Write 135
Mixed 365
SusWrite 261
98% 451 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 58.5
145% 58.4 MB/s
DQ Read 967
DQ Write 596
DQ Mixed 691
539% 751 MB/s
Poor: 87%
This bench: 140%
Great: 230%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2G43BB2-CWE 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
50.8% Above average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 15.5
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 84.3
47% 84.3 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 23.8" 1280 720 AUS24CC VZ249
Typical OptiPlex 3000 Builds (Compare 655 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 3000

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback