HP Z6 G4 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 141%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 176%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics191% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive157% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Z6 G4 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81C6
Memory88.1 GB free of 96 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 09 '24 at 23:42
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Gold 6148
CPU0, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Memory 74.7
1-Core 102
2-Core 203
71% 127 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 797
71% 601 Pts
64-Core 2,324
144% 2,324 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
191% Outstanding
Lighting 277
Reflection 263
Parallax 295
226% 278 fps
MRender 323
Gravity 230
Splatting 168
188% 240 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 191%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
409GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AADA4106 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 775 607 619 577 556 469 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
157% Outstanding
Read 1,251
Write 559
Mixed 530
SusWrite 601
163% 735 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 33.3
132% 52.9 MB/s
DQ Read 770
DQ Write 604
DQ Mixed 349
353% 575 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 157%
Great: 251%
MB2000GCWLT 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: HPG3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 43 37 44 43 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 169
Write 42.9
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 42.3
57% 77.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 93%
MB2000GCWLT 2TB
203GB free
Firmware: HPG3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 32 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 111
Write 37.2
Mixed 45.2
SusWrite 36.9
42% 57.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M386A4G40DM0-CPB 3x31.7GB
3 of 6 slots used
95GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
70.7% Very good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 22.7
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 17.7
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 85.5
47% 85.5 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 144 31.5" 2560 1369 SAM7080 LC32G5xT
Typical Z6 G4 Workstation Builds (Compare 631 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht

System: HP Z6 G4 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback